In most English-speaking countries, a person who is accused of a crime has the right to a “trial by jury”. |
In a trial by jury, the guilt or innocence of the accused person |
is decided by a group of 12 people, called jurors, |
who must listen to the evidence about the case. |
The idea of a trial by jury is over 800 years old, |
but there was a time when criminal cases were decided in other ways. |
Today, many of these methods seem ridiculous and cruel. |
Many accused people were forced to undergo a trial by ordeal. |
There were several different kinds of this trial. |
For example, in the ordeal by fire, |
an accused man was forced to carry a red-hot piece of iron in his hand. |
People believed that if the man were innocent then the gods would protect him, |
and his hand would not be burned or blistered by the iron. |
Another form of the trial by ordeal was the ordeal by combat. |
If one person accused another of a crime, |
they would be forced to fight each other with some weapon. |
People believed that the gods would help the man who was right |
and allow him to win the fight. |
Yet another kind of ordeal was the ordeal by water. |
If a woman was accused of a crime, such as witchcraft, |
she might be thrown into a river with rocks attached to her. |
People believed that the gods would help an innocent woman and allow her to float on the water. |
Gradually, people realized that the trial by ordeal was a completely worthless way to judge a person’s innocence or guilt. |
They wanted a less barbaric way to decide criminal cases. |
During the twelfth century, a new method was introduced by one of the kings of England, Henry the Second. |
Henry said that criminal cases should be decided by the opinions of twelve honest men |
who knew about the crime, the victim, and the accused person. |
This was the beginning of trial by jury in English-speaking countries, |
and the method soon became very popular. |
People trusted this new method much more than they trusted the old methods. |
Later, the system of trial by jury changed somewhat. |
Instead of having a jury of twelve men and women who knew about the crime, |
juries were chosen so that the twelve people did not know anything about the crime. |
This change ensures that the jurors do not have any bias or prejudice about the case. |
When jurors do not know any of the people involved in the case, |
their decisions are more likely to be fair and accurate. |
Today, citizens in many countries are called occasionally for jury duty. |
This can be inconvenient for people who are busy with their work and family life. |
However, many men and women are willing to serve on juries |
because of a feeling of responsibility to society. |
The use of juries in criminal cases helps to ensure that justice is done. |
More English listening lessons for intermediate level:
Lesson 53: African Slavery in the America
I don’t think the title of your article matches the content lol. Just kidding, mainly because I had some doubts after reading the article.